CultureHack, Triangulated

Email Observations About and Sidelong Glances at Consensual Delusions 
Filed under

novel

 

Zen and Tonics

The Sixth Excerpt From a Work-In-Progress

Christ, it’s like an establishment shot: The light raking across the impossible keyboard--eight octaves of ebony and laminate that float in the darkness of a dead-still studio. The only thing that’s really missing is a superimposed time-and-place. You sit here in front of the layers of lacquer, the hand-fitted hardwood and felted hammers, in a moment of zen silence that honors experience, confidence, passion and belief. A Bösendorfer Imperial Grand, better known to you as The Beast, where craft has been taken well beyond even unreasonable expectations.

The nine extra keys, all weirdly black, make this the porn star of pianos. And back in the day, you’d occasionally test them to make certain the dark octave still worked. But that was as far as it ever went; nothing was played down there. This was because you knew of no music that needed these extra notes: you’d been in the business of churning-out pop, with a limited need for repertoire--though you suspected that even in classical music, such pieces were extremely rare.

But here's the thing about that extra octave: it doesn’t actually have to be played. Just its existence down there at the end affects the other 88 keys. Piano strings resonate, they don't need to be struck, and something played in an upper octave inevitably bounces off those nine lurking strings. When the music comes back, it's been transformed by the trip, like a mind broadened by travel.

You know this because even though you played pop, your real love has always been jazz. And there parts of chords are often left out; only the tops of harmonic series are played--3rds and 6ths, 7ths and 9ths, 11ths and sometimes even 13ths. The tonic notes in all of these cases are provided by the listener’s imagination. But on a Bösendorfer Imperial Grand, the sympathetic resonance of the extra strings fills those blanks and completes the chords.

As implied by their color, these additional notes are the equivalent of dark matter in astronomy--invisible, but changing whatever is played anywhere on the piano. An attentive audience can sense the extra octave; its proof is in every subliminal tonic. So yes, dark matter: something in the music that can only be explained by something outside of it . . .

Craft that’s been taken well beyond even unreasonable expectations--the thing on which you’re supposed to bash-out a formula that transcends itself. Which is ironic, because among the many things you lack are confidence, passion and belief. But since you know this from long experience, at least you’re assured of that: you’ve seen the block and been around it any number of times, just like the still-alive bomb defuser or, more accurately, a wily, old whore. In this Post-Steinman world, you’re not really sure if one out of four will do, but then again, with nothing else left, it’s the only thing you’ve got to work with.

You sit here in the perpetual studio twilight; finally alone, but not really: the black-lacquered Beast completely fills this corner and causes a tightness in your chest. You’re that guy in Alien, eating his breakfast and ignoring a bad case of heartburn, who seconds later is blown apart by something deep inside him. It’s been years since you’ve seen a Model 290--the past decade, after all, has been carefully designed to detour around this reunion. But all roads, it seems, have still led back here, to the dimly lit, looming Beast. Thus this struggle to stare it down, because you'd really like to look away.

You’re petrified that you can't do this anymore--you haven't written a pop song in 10 fucking years. And thinking back, it seems quite possible that maybe you never knew how. You had stopped writing because you couldn't fully express yourself--pop music had always been too tonic-based. To be crowd-pleasing, the chords always had to be completed, tidy and hummable. Just as each lyric had to be ground-down to the fewest syllables and tightest rhymes. Audiences had wanted nothing left to their imaginations, and in obliging them with skillful craft, you had made a generous living. Back then you had written on another Beast, because you once held hope for all 97 keys. But really, everything could have been composed on a battered, rehearsal-hall upright. Because back then the extra strings had resonated with the tonics that you dutifully provided, taking something that had been utterly obvious and making it even more so. Every blatant chord wound up with its own harmonic reinforcement, something touring had further underscored with a riser of backup singers. Doubled-tonics wrapped in doubled vocals--this had been the essence of your dalliance with Pop: in no way truth, but loudly done twice over for effect. Rhetoric, with massive amps and a truck full of custom lighting . . .

Filed under  //   excerpt   formal absence   music   novel   writing  

Comments [0]

Mixdown

First, a word of explanation: This post is primarily for myself--see it as a chef 's annotation of a recipe, capturing the meta-stuff that transcends ingredients and linear flow. I've just finished revising a scene in the novel, and the solution--downstream from all the hair-pulling--ended up being emblematic of the larger work. And so, while I'm still thinking clearly about it, it's certainly worth making some notes.


But at the same time, I'm not opposed to interested parties looking over my shoulder from a kind of operating-theater gallery. (The deeper truth is that I simply can't write for myself; I'm hard-wired to address ranks of readers--at least conceptually. Thus, in order to get these thoughts down, they'll need to be published in some fashion, and--well--that's where you come in.) And that, as they say, is that: This piece will be of interest--or not. Proceed at your own risk (and for my part, I'll pretend that all of you have stayed, hypnotized by every word). 

***
It's not lost on me that writing a book with a recording-studio as a leitmotiv has itself been very much like multitrack recording. Unlike anything else I've done, this writing can be said to be layered. Just as one might separately record individual instruments and vocals, the book's been very much built--accreted, if you will, over time. And, to extend the recording metaphor, the attendant revisions increasingly feel like I'm at a mixing desk.

But here's the thing--by reaching for multitrack recording, I'm not thinking wall-of-sound; this isn't about "Mountain High, River Deep," and it has nothing to do with "Born To Run." Rather, the process I've settled into is more akin to old-school Jamaican dub music--it's a reductive approach. By design, I've allowed myself to over-write in the context of the minimal style I envision for the novel. And then comes the mixdown-cum-revision, which reduces each sequence to its essence. This process isn't about cutting per se--it's about a kind of distillation; reduction in its literal sense. Shortening does occur, but only as a consequence. In most instances, it's not about jettisoning material as much as a more efficient "repacking" of the meaning. 

I usually try not to think about this process while I'm writing; I'm fearful of a killing self-consciousness. But sometimes a revision is successful enough to remind me of how I'm proceeding--like today, for instance.

The scene involves the protagonist arriving at a Boston hotel for a liaison with his lover. The meeting is simply the most recent in a long history of their rendezvous. The hotel is boutique property, a post-modern riff on mid-20th century Europe, undercut with sly, contemporary winks. It's an always-fresh-flowers kind of place. The protagonist hasn't seen his lover recently and, as desire builds, he's the proverbial horse seeing the barn door. The original draft set all of this out in well-chosen but lengthy detail: The cut of the staff uniforms (minimal gray tunics) and their sedate-to-point-of-sinister collective demeanor; the single round table in the center of the small-means-exclusive lobby, on which sit over-the-top vases of Jan Brueghel-ish flowers; a remembered itinerary of past hotels where they've met; the usual checking-in dialogue and related stage business; and then the sudden sanctuary of a ride in empty elevator up to her floor.

Nice, even good--hell, well-written, if I do say so. But not well-suited to (or of a piece with) the lean, impressionistic novel that's taking form. Thus the best way to understand this rough-draft scene is as 12, 24 or even 36 filled tracks in a Jamaican studio--ready to be used as raw material for something radically streamlined--because there's way too much percussion, more guitar than will ever be used and at least one too many bass lines. But the interesting thing about the best dub music is that few tracks are completely eliminated--the art lays in the use of brief licks that also suggest the density of the source material. 

Put another way, and moved to another musical genre, Miles Davis once said of a zen-simple solo, "You have to know 400 notes that you can play, then pick the right four." It's about distilled, resonant quality over self-indulgent, less-thought-out quantity.

This morning was mixdown time for the previously described hotel scene: lots of work, lots of coffee, lots of reading aloud, lots of frustration and definitely lots of not-minimal profanity. The result is a distilled 40 words:

Sometimes San Francisco and often New York, but never before in Boston. Confirmation she’s arrived, a key at the desk, and then elevator doors wiping the lobby: gray, Kubrick bellmen and baroque floral arrangements replaced by brushed steel and Vivaldi.


And if I'd been able to get it down to 35 words, I'd have gone there, too--but, after all, there are some limits. Miles, as always, was right: Know all 250-plus words of the scene, and then pick the right 40 . . .

Something else struck me in mid-revision this morning: I suspect that so-called world-building, so beloved by science fiction and fantasy authors, is also in play. Though I've never seen it discussed, there seems to be a tacit assumption that nominally naturalistic fiction doesn't world-build--that it merely slit-scans Real Life. But does it? What if world-building is always an intermediate step? What if Real Life needs the artistic equivalent of digitalizing analogue audio tape? What if nominally naturalistic fiction slit-scans a larger fictionalized world instead of Real Life itself?

My rough-draft of the hotel scene was a narrower, more manageable version of life. But what was needed--what is always needed, at least in this book--is a further-narrowed impression of the larger fiction. I've no idea if other authors work in this fashion; all I know is that I do: That fact that my story isn't set five centuries from now in a a distant galaxy doesn't mean world-building isn't needed.

And with a scotch or two and a little cockiness, I like to think that the 40-word distillation of the hotel scene has more energy and resonance because there's a genuine sense of a larger world lurking beyond its edges. Since I've referred to Kubrick in the revision, maybe this will help explain what I mean: When Kubrick was filming Paths of Glory, he asked for something like  250 degrees of art direction in a scene. Afterwards, when the art director saw the camera set-up, he complained to the director that the audience wouldn't see most of his set--to which Kubrick replied, "Yes, but the actors will." Maybe on an emotional level, it's necessary for my irritatingly second-person protagonist to see more of the hotel than the reader . . .

Make no mistake, I'm not holding this revised passage up as an example of fine writing. Rather, I'm  presenting the revision of the hotel sequence as a fractal of entire book's creation. Scholars have said that The Great Gatsby was only realized in revision and, without suggesting I've delusions of grandeur about my book, I'm beginning to understand, after all these years, what that observation really means.

Filed under  //   excerpt   formal absence   novel   writing  

Comments [0]

Reinvention

The Third Excerpt From a Work-In-Progress


It’s dusk when you roll up the driveway to the future and, like a carny wheel coming to rest, the Lexus slows then brakes, and the windscreen frames the 121 on Beatrice’s new house. Which is, in fact, not new at all, being at least as old as either of you: Her reinvented life is built atop 40 years of other people’s endings; an occupancy dependent on inevitable departures. And all these concluded histories seem to tarnish her passionate commitment, providing actuarial tables for something that’s just begun.

Maybe new plays better amidst the new, or at least in temporary surroundings. Visited cities are seen as romantic because they’re interstitial: The asynchronous nature of hotel rooms and getting lost just blocks away tend to make reinvention seem far simpler than it is.

For her, starting over is a variation; a jazz riff on a well-known tune. It's Miles and Trane reimagining "Someday My Prince Will Come:" Shards of the original song remain, embedded beneath the surface, the remnants of other princes past from different places and times.

Her upheaval had stopped at the neighborhood’s edge: slightly farther away from her life with Jack, somewhat closer to her family and friends, and within easy walking distance of the better downtown shops. The winds of change may have gusted through, but they had left her zip code intact.

No, the new start here is your own, and the disconnections will be radical and complete. You’ll need to begin again from scratch, without the safety net of the familiar or a sense of history.

The Nakamichi ejects Lucinda’s CD, and luxury-car silence supplants the dirt-poor twang. Four producers, three studios and two mixdowns had been needed to create authenticity. And though you consider pointing this out, you keep the irony private. Because Beatrice’s connection to her own roots may prove as tenuously honest. 

She stares at the house, her profile traced by the bounce of the headlamps off the garage door: And at right angles, patrician still describes her best, just as it did in the moment you first saw her. During all this time there’s never been a need for any other adjective. But when she turns to you that other thing happens--the nobility of her nose disappears. Full-face, she exhibits a blunter elegance, more Emma Thompson than Emma Peel.

"All this change has literally made me ill--I can't even begin to tell you how much. But now, thank god, you’re finally here, and everything’s going to be okay." The tight-lipped smile as she puts the car in park disappears just before she kills the lights.

You’re lead around to the back of the house and up vestigial echoes of the cottage stairs: Those three dangerous flights down to the sea have contracted into a backyard stoop. And you wonder if the future will similarly shrink into something sensible, stolid and cautious.

In the kitchen beyond the patio doors the dirty dishes make you squirm. For the first time with Beatrice, you have a sense of genuine intrusion: A deep and sudden need for decorum, or at least a house-warming gift. This is visiting, an interruption of her life’s daily flow, and its currents are eddying around you. It’s the reason that even tender disruptions can only be temporary: All visits require resolution, either by ending or melding with the everyday. Thus staying on here means a giving-in to her provincial undertow.

The cottage, in contrast, had always seemed equidistant from each of your lives. The Gray House had never really been a home, just the consensual emblem of one. It had been forced to provide a sense of here in the absence of anything better: Because outside its weathered clapboard half-remembered hotel rooms had swirled, their color schemes and awful artwork bleeding into one another. But for all the passionate commandeering of the cottage as a port in that storm, it had remained another liminal bedroom, albeit with a beachfront view. Reinvention once again had seemed far simpler than it really was . . . .

Filed under  //   excerpt   formal absence   novel  

Comments [0]

The Dull Ache of Dormancy

The Second Excerpt From a Work-In-Progress

Shopping-cart vibration of ancient gurney wheels. Slap-back, metallic echoes off linoleum and old cinderblock. Rustle of swarming emergency techs and fragments of bad news: pressure-dropping tumbles through probable-pneumothorax. This is how she reenters your life: In a pool of unstaunchable blood, as patient-to-three and move-it-people collide and  intertwine. She's fading right in front of you; back, yet slipping away. And you want to say Hold on, but the irony stops you dead . . . .

    "Ready, then, to tidy up?" The voice seems to come from everywhere. And though you'd like to answer No, the car-wreck curiosity is irresistible. Turning away is useless because you’re already rubbernecking--even though this freakish accident happens to be your own.

    In a swivel chair on an oriental rug, you’re waiting for playback and remembering Steppenwolf: Well, you don't know what we can find / Why don't you come with me little girl? But on a different kind of magic carpet ride--one that's the opposite of escape. The dimmed halogens at the edges of the studio spill a tarnished light down the walls, yellowing the acoustic panels before smudging into shadow. This, even as the fixture above your chair blazes at maximum setting, containing you and the ivory-handled cane in a cone of glacial light . . . .

 

    In the hotel, at the window, you stare at the inlet and then past it, to the mountains, ice and sky beyond. At True North and unfettered possibilities. Standing here, now that she’s behind you; staring, even as  she makes her oblique way south, toward the narrow selection of unacceptable futures that put everyone at risk but her. Aside from a wrung-out bitch or whispered lover, what more is there left to say? . . . .

 

    "Standing by for 'Post-Modern Pop Song;' digital transfer of original mix, yes?" The Engineer makes this question an announcement, his voice omnipresent between the monitors. Squinting through the Arctic light and beyond its glare on the control booth window, you see him silhouetted against the halogen-glint on all that gear for re-polishing your past: Business-brisk, in service to the entertainment industry and bathed in the glow of his professional tools. Apart from a terse Let’s do it, then, what more is there left to say?

    And now you want a cigarette--for the first time in many years. Recording studio. Engineer. Hidden dread before playback. Making music means chain smoking--or at least it did. It's Proust’s madeleine-and-limeflower tea, but turned inside out: Circumstances have conjured up a sacred object from the past. And though you try, you can’t shake the desire because in addiction there is no gone. Absence there becomes abstinence; the dull ache of dormancy. Lou Reed materializes then, fading up with some mid-chorus advice: You're still doing things I gave up years ago--which are true words in a truer song . . . .

 

    “Ducky, there’s no irony in being a doctor who smokes. We all do things that just aren’t good for us; quite indefensible stuff, really.” Julia  shrugs and glances at the Silk Cut, her own indefensible thing. “Some of these behaviors are as blatant as this, but the less obvious ones are no less damaging.” Cigarette glow at her lips again, and more blue-gray smoke as she contemplates you. Then, after a long moment’s hesitation: “Well, Darling, just look at yourself . . . .”

    You're beginning to adjust to the disconnectedness at the heart of Studio World: A perpetual twilight between the centuries that might be anywhere. And yes, the time frame could be narrowed a little by identifying the modules and racked MIDI units. But the spartan trend in component design makes everything an echo of Jonathan Ive. Which is why the concept of Where is useless: The hardware’s international minimalism has eliminated any sense of “here.”

    But all of this is academic because you don't know the tech--at least not like you did: Well, after all, just look at yourself. And so you lean back in the chair: Surrounded by speakers, wanting nicotine and free-floating in a cloudy pool of maybe 10 years. It occurs to you that your resurrection fantasy had always been much more specific than this--even as the details of how you came to be here begin to soften and smudge.

    You'd written the hit song for a successful film. Except in reality you hadn't . . . .

Filed under  //   excerpt   formal absence   novel   writing  

Comments [0]

The Narcotic Blessing of Forgetfulness

An Excerpt From a Work-In-Progress

Though Beatrice doesn’t live at the end of the world, this is beginning to seem a technicality. Because so far it feels like you’re driving through an early Springsteen album: leather, denim and baseball caps inside too many tricked-out cars. And the endless succession of skinny kids hanging around on every corner; like that one, with his upended bike, kneeling next to the ratcheting gears. The town exudes a civic pride in being a kind of Wayne’s World simulation, and this guarantees the wink you've been waiting for is never going to come: each one of these chop tops is aspirational instead of a John Waters reference, and you’ll need to think hard about that tonight, with scotch and a long journal entry . . . . 

 

Something never thought about; something almost forgotten: The whir of a push mower and the play of sunlight on leaves that will be gone in three years’ time. Which makes you what? Seven years old? Or very close to it.

Your father's mower whirring in the front yard, under the canopy of limbs that will soon be diseased. But all the memories of him have been too-long packed away, and so you have to make do with impressions: He’s conjured up as short, with darkish hair; in a white tee shirt, inappropriate pants and the smudgy suggestion of work shoes. All of this Sears-Catalog neat; it’s almost conceptual clothing. Because you can’t recall if he sweats while working out there--or if he perspires at all. Which, it now becomes clear, is also the reason you’ve parted and combed his hair.

Another season’s whirring, across a less-shaded lawn, as the last elms in the neighborhood begin their rapid decline. The kitchen’s still there; it can still be imagined, complete with its strange dimensions: too narrow and too long and then all at once wide in a way you remember as momentary. It's where the savage intimacies of the family had most often been exchanged; collisions leaving many more scars than that dangerous drawer full of loose German knives. In the kitchen the family had been too distant and at the same time much too close; it had been a place where acceptance widened-out, only to narrow and close ranks again. The dining room, however, has become theoretical--as detail-free as the interchangeable dinners that had marked each holiday and celebration. Reduced to an essence half a lifetime later, this room’s revealed to have been the kitchen in a chandeliered Sunday Best; where weekday dictates and intolerance had been served up on good china. But its mislaid appearance has also faded these uneasy memories: the narcotic blessing of forgetfulness, though late, has at last arrived.

Still later, on a stifling night long before there’s any air-conditioning, a spray truck whirs past your tight-shut window, fogging yellow-lit neighborhood streets. This last-ditch rescue of the trees comes at the songbirds’ expense, because the insecticide kills many more robins than the number of elms it saves. The Midwest, however, is equal parts of momentum and determination--there once something is put into motion, no price seems too high to pay. Which isn’t surprising, because a comfortable rut is the most costly thing of all.

And then your father’s mower, blades glinting in the bright sun, trims around the new birch, avoiding the stakes. But the whirring this time is your childhood receding, leaving you earthbound, stranded and ten.

Wires and stakes, three sets of them; a new beginning secured in this stark new world. With the elms now gone, what was hidden is revealed: A ruler-straight horizon below a featureless sky. The kind of flatness that makes it seem you can see the neighboring states. But seeing forever is of little use when there's nothing to be seen: The town is bordered on all sides by regressions of itself; either countless other identical places, like the result of facing mirrors, or greener, simplified versions of a single, industrial sprawl. Urban and rural are cinched together by the Rust Belt’s psychogeography: Outside of the townships--out among the cows--the only thing that changes is the population count. The scenery shifts, but can never avoid the grim context of the region. The feel of heavy manufacturing thrums, even when it can’t be seen; an analog of the locust drone that had once throbbed throughout the elms.

Hand clippers are used to trim those places the mower is too big to reach, and with practice, you’ve become adept at keeping the lawn from obscuring the stakes. With the elm trees gone, the town is exposed; it’s like that scientific toy from last Christmas--the scale-model man with all his bones and organs showing through clear-plastic skin. You're beginning to see the town’s inner-workings, all the stuff that’s meant to be kept out of sight. And though too young to to do anything about it, you start to realize you want to get away. For one thing, the car worship is like weekday church, and the truth is you’ve never believed. But your friends had killed time watching from corners, shouting out models and years. And so at those intersections you had learned politeness; learned the benign dishonesty of manners, discovering that smiling could be a disguise for your deep and abiding disinterest. There’s also the bullying of those smarter or different; something shrugged-off like the weather. It’s tolerated in the kids because their parents also do it, with dismissiveness instead of scuffling. Getting good grades and reading books are invitations to be called a faggot. But the teachers won't help because they're unwilling to battle willful ignorance that's generations deep . . . You're wasting your life in this insular town, caught up in its rituals, repetition and rules. Because after you’re done faking all of that interest, after the hallway hassles over ruined grade curves, what’s left of your day is further splintered by narrow, ceremonial patterns: hymnals, baseball and frequent house arrest for asking unanswerable questions. So yes, now that the elms are no longer here, you can see things you want to leave behind. Is it possible staking the new tree to the ground is to prevent it from trying to escape? To keep it from pulling up its burlapped root ball before that becomes impossible? To guard against the birch floating away from this flattened desolation, to where its paper-curled presence has a chance of better fitting in? Standing here staring at the endless horizon, you feel a similar tethering: You may not live at the end of the world, but this is beginning to seem a technicality . . . .

Filed under  //   excerpt   formal absence   novel   writing  

Comments [0]

The Inescapable Key of Me

About a week ago on Twitter, I shared this epiphany: "Since I revise responding to the endless reading aloud of passages, the novel's "definitive" unpacking is my accent and cadences." And since then, I've continued to think about this in terms of consequences and implications. I suspect the pondering is because, for me, vocalizing / revising is an atypical workflow in a writing career lengthy enough to deserve a Doctor-Who regeneration. 


Please note I said "atypical," and not "unprecedented." Over the years, I've certainly read passages aloud--especially In those faux Hollywood moments when I'm trying to nail elusive prose while staring into a deadline. But not consistently; not without fail; not to the extent that the final revision is always the version that yields the most successful recitation. At the same time, I feel that when the novel is finished and I move on to a new project, chances are good I'll revert to, well, a  quieter way of working. My sense is that this book has chosen its own workflow--art, like leaking water, will find its own way through any wall. There's no doubt new work will establish its own idiosyncratic, creative conduit--which I admit looking forward to, since the current stream of required throat lozenges is unexpected overhead in my writing.

But what I haven't been pondering during the past week is why I'm writing the book in this manner; the tangled psycho-dynamics of that, while probably a therapist's payday, might kill the work dead in mid-sentence. It's better--and safer--to limit myself to the how and what of my current approach. 

And to these ends, let's first consider singer/songwriter Lou Reed--but not for his edgy material, dodgy early behavior or later French deification. What's germane to this discussion is his famously limited vocal range. Reed's voice and material mostly exist in a neat one-to-one relationship: three-chord, world-weary rock is performed by an insouciant, three-note voice. Well and good, but what I want to know is if soaring arias exist inside his head--impossibly high notes that the limitations of his voice filter out during the composition of songs. Even more importantly, is right-for-his-voice necessarily synonymous with right-for-his-vision? Is "Perfect Day" what Reed wanted to do, or simply what he could manage? And, ultimately, does this parsing matter in terms of assessing the song? 

I'm thinking about Reed a lot these days because my own limited voice is the sole determinant of what remains on the page. Final revisions are being made based on the ease of my recitations. Let me say this again in a different way: I'm not further polishing images, I'm not further tweaking structure, and certainly I'm not fucking with wayward leitmotifs. I'm revising to improve my comfort when reading the material aloud. And this isn't a way of obliquely saying I'm refining sentence meter because that was dealt with in the mists of time on much earlier drafts. What seems to be occurring is an adjustment of long vowels and the honing of emotional ambience in ways I can't explain.

 On occasion, superior instances of "pure" writing have been discarded in favor of less-crafted passages that better suit my voice. Which leads back to my wonderment about how Lou Reed writes--if he could sing like Pavarotti, would we have a different "Perfect Day?" And--critically--would it be a somehow truer version? If I had the accent and cadences of a Jeremy Irons, would the book be locked down differently? And if so, would the unquestionably more emotive version be any more authentic?

Another issue I keep thinking about is the affect of a vocalize / revise approach on open textuality. Consider again our old friend, Reed--there are not a lot of cover versions of his back catalog; something usually ascribed to the extreme nature of his themes. But I don't think this is the main reason that other artists ignore his songs. For a two- or three-octave singer, there's not a lot of room for interpretation in narrow-range melodies. Annie Lennox doesn't sing "How Do You Think It Feels?" for reasons beyond the lyric's portrayal of paranoid drug addiction. I've worked hard to create an openness in the novel's text--encouraging a variety of emotional entries into the work and a wide range of interpretations. But if the final revision is thoroughly tied to my flawed and ragged voice, have I not implicitly suggested the 'real' interpretation of the book is my own recitation? If I let myself think too long about this, it becomes a real quandary. 

All of this too-sensitive-to-live, artistic dithering has been front-and-center because I'm thinking about blogging an excerpt from the book. And in choosing which part to unleash on the world, there's a temptation to select a sequence that's less tied to my voice--except, of course, there aren't any. This, in turn, suggested a post like this might be interesting--a public confession and presentation of my writing as a kind of visible-gear, Lexan clock. I thought it might philosophically prepare the way while the chosen excerpt is readied.

This is why I've decided to share an advance paragraph and, to make a probably unwise point, also provide its audio file--me, in Spector-ish, monophonic glory, letting you know what I intended, even if it runs counter to what you might have taken away. In short, clarifying and suicidal simultaneously. For maximum impact, I suggest reading the paragraph before you listen to it.

And that's it--back to the work itself, instead of this Prince-Hamlet posturing. After all, downstream of a few hundred-thousand words, the book can only be what it is--sounding, of course, like the odd wisdom of the De Niro character in Deer Hunter . . .  

-------------------

Another season’s whirring, across a less-shaded lawn, as the last elms in the neighborhood begin their rapid decline. The kitchen’s still there; it can still be imagined, complete with its strange dimensions: Too narrow and too long and then all at once wide in a way you remember as momentary. It's where the savage intimacies of the family had most often been exchanged; collisions leaving many more scars than that drawer full of loose German knives. In the kitchen the family had been too distant and at the same time much too close; it had been a place where acceptance widened-out, only to narrow again. The dining room, however, is only theoretical; it’s now as detail-free as those interchangeable dinners that had marked each holiday and celebration. Reduced to an essence half a lifetime later, this room’s revealed to have been the kitchen in chandeliered Sunday Best; where weekday dictates and intolerance had been served up on good china. But its mislaid appearance has also faded these uneasy memories: The narcotic blessing of forgetfulness, though late, has at last arrived.

 

The Narcotic Blessing Of Forgetfulness by Kevin Sheridan  

Filed under  //   audio   excerpt   novel   writing  

Comments [0]

The All-Singing, All-Dancing Multimedia Test

Let's see if I can be theoretically entertaining even as I'm poking around the multimedia potential of this place. 

 
On occasion, I write songs with Bazz Atlas--or, more to the point, provide the lyrics for songs that he pens. Not too long ago, we wrote a song that's turned out to one of my personal favorites. It's called "On Your Way (Racing the Sunset)," and figures into a novel I'm writing and also a theater piece that's a kind of adjunct to the book.
 
Recently--when I should have been working the revision of a chapter--I amused myself by designing a single "sleeve" for the song. (This isn't quite the dicking-around it seems: In the novel, the protagonist writes "On Your Way" rather than Mr Atlas and me, and it came time to describe the marketing of the song. And so I had to wonder what the sleeve for "On Your Way" looked like--a sound idea seeing that I'm in the word-picture business. It seemed most efficient to actually create the sleeve and then describe it . . .)
 
I took my lyric for the song and sent it through a service that's designed to create keyword clouds for websites, telling it to ignore common words. I then randomized the layout and spec'ed the typeface and color palette. I have to say, wrecking such havoc on a lyric I'd worked so hard on was liberating and I was pleased by the emotions the  word-cloud generator had foregrounded:

 
Talk about multitasking: I get a sleeve that can be dramatically described, real-world Bazz gets a graphic he may want to use and I do the single most self-effacing thing a lyricist can conceive of--worse than not including the words at all--I've cold-bloodedly deconstructed all my careful rhymes and metrics. Can you say masochism
 
In case you're interested, here's a demo of the song-in-question:

On Your Way (Racing The Sunset/Beatrice's Song) by Atlassheridan/Atlassheridan  

And--because I'm not that self-effacing--here's the lyric:

And that's pretty much it: I've managed to test the posting of a sound file, a PDF and a JPEG while saying something with a bit more depth than "Let's see if this works"--though rest assured that as I'm pressing Send, that's pretty much what I'll be thinking . . .

Filed under  //   design   lyrics   novel   songs   test  

Comments [0]